Perforación duodenal por barotrauma durante colangiopancreatografía retrógrada endoscópica: caso clínico / Duodenal perforation due to barotrauma during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: clinical case

Resumen Introducción: La perforación duodenal secundaria a la colangiopancreatografía retrógrada endoscópica (CPRE) es una complicación infrecuente y más aún cuando su mecanismo lesional es por barotrauma. La inyección de aire a alta presión produce un neumoretroperitoneo, cuya extensión y evolución lesional es incierta. Caso Clínico: Se comunica el caso de un hombre joven que sufrió una perforación duodenal durante una CPRE, su manejo quirúrgico y evolución. Discusión: El diagnóstico clínico-imagenológico suele ser precoz y claro si se detecta la lesión durante el procedimiento. El manejo terapéutico conservador o quirúrgico de esta entidad depende de varios factores que se analizan en el presente estudio.

Introduction: Duodenal perforation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a rare complication and even more if the mechanism of injury is secondary to barotrauma. The injection of high-pressure-air produces a pneumo-retroperitoneum, the extent and lesional evolution of which is uncertain. Clinical Case: We report the case of a young man who suffered a duodenal perforation during an ERCP, his surgical management and evolution. Discussion: The clinical-imaging diagnosis is usually early and clear if the lesion is detected during the procedure. Its conservative or surgical management will depends on several factors that are analyzed in the present study.

Profilaxia da pancreatite pós-colangiopancreatografia retrógrada endoscópica: avaliação de dois regimes com AINEs diferentes / Post endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis prophylaxis: evaluation of two different nsaid regimens

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is a widely used therapeutic modality for the pancreaticobiliary tree. However, it is responsible for the highest rates of complications among the endoscopic procedures, especially post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis. The preventive methods include mechanical and pharmacological approaches, such as the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of two different strategies using non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for the prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis, and to clarify the uncertainty about the route of administration of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the prevention of this complication. METHODS: This was a prospective trial. Two therapeutic groups were compared with a control group that was composed of patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, performed in the same service and by the same team in the period preceding the study (historical series), without the administration of any type of prophylaxis. The first group received 100 mg rectal diclofenac. The second group received 100 mg intravenous ketoprofen. Both groups were compared, separately and jointly, with the control group. RESULTS: Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis occurred in 4.39% (12/273) of the participants. In the group without prophylaxis, the incidence was 6.89% (10/145). Among those who received intravenous ketoprofen, the incidence was 2.56% (2/78). No cases of acute post-procedural pancreatitis were observed in the group that received rectal diclofenac (0/52). Although there was no statistical difference between the therapeutic groups when they were separately analyzed, a statistical difference in the prevention of post-procedural pancreatitis was observed when they were analyzed together (P=0.037). CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence for the efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the prophylaxis of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis.

RESUMO CONTEXTO: A colangiopancreatografia retrógrada endoscópica (CPRE) é uma modalidade terapêutica amplamente utilizada para vias biliopancreáticas, responsável pelas taxas mais elevadas de complicações entre os procedimentos endoscópicos, especialmente a pancreatite pós-CPRE (PPC). Os métodos preventivos incluem abordagens mecânicas e farmacológicas, entre elas, a utilização de antinflamatórios não esteroidais (AINEs). OBJETIVO: Comparar a eficácia de duas estratégias diferentes utilizando AINEs para a prevenção de PPC. Elucidar o cenário incerto sobre a via de administração do AINEs na prevenção da PPC. MÉTODOS - Ensaio clínico prospectivo. Duas estratégias terapêuticas foram comparadas a um grupo controle, composto por pacientes submetidos a CPRE no mesmo serviço e com a mesma equipe no período anterior ao estudo (série histórica), que não recebeu qualquer tipo de profilaxia. O primeiro grupo experimental recebeu 100 mg de diclofenaco via retal, o segundo grupo recebeu 100 mg de cetoprofeno endovenoso. Ambos os grupos foram comparados separadamente e em associação com o grupo de controle. RESULTADOS: A PPC ocorreu em 4,39% (12/273) dos participantes. No grupo sem profilaxia, esta incidência foi de 6,89% (10/145); entre os que receberam cetoprofeno endovenoso foi de 2,56% (2/78). Não houve casos de pancreatite aguda após o procedimento no grupo que recebeu diclofenaco via retal (0/52). Apesar de não haver diferença estatística entre estes grupos analisados separadamente, quando os dois grupos terapêuticos são analisados em conjunto estes apresentam diferenças estatísticas na prevenção da PPC (P=0,037). CONCLUSÃO: Este estudo foi capaz de corroborar a eficácia da utilização de AINEs para a profilaxia de pancreatite pós-CPRE.

Effects of the timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography on liver, bile, and inflammatory indices and cholecysto-choledocholithiasis patient prognoses

OBJECTIVES: This study explored the effects of the timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) on liver function, bile biochemical indices, inflammatory reactions, and cholecysto-choledocholithiasis patient prognoses. METHODS: A total of 103 cholecysto-choledocholithiasis patients were stratified into control (CG; n=51; LC at 4-7 d after ERCP) and observation groups (OG; n=52; LC at 1-3 d after ERCP) using a random number table. RESULTS: The surgical time was shorter and intraoperative blood loss was less in OG than in CG, and the two groups were not statistically different in terms of time to the first passage of gas through anus, length of postoperative hospital stay, conversion rate to laparotomy, and stone-free rate. Four weeks after LC, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), total bilirubin (TBil), albumin (ALB), and glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) levels declined in both groups, but the difference was not statistically significant. Three days after LC, total bile acid (TBA) levels increased, and cholesterol (CHO), unconjugated bilirubin (UCB), and TBiL levels were reduced in both groups, but were not statistically different (p>0.05). Three days after LC, interleukin (IL)-6, procalcitonin (PCT), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels in the serum and bile increased in both groups and were lower in OG. The total incidence of perioperative complications was 1.92% in OG, which was lower than 15.69% in the CG. CONCLUSION: For cholecysto-choledocholithiasis patients, LC at 1-3 d after ERCP can shorten surgical times, reduce intraoperative blood loss, improve liver function and bile biochemistry, relieve inflammatory reactions, reduce complications, and improve prognoses.

During which period should we avoid cholecystectomy in patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography? / Durante qual período devemos evitar a colecistectomia em pacientes que realizaram colangiopancreatografia retrógrada endoscópica?

ABSTRACT Objective: To determine the period during which we should avoid cholecystectomy after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Methods: A retrospective analysis of electronic medical charts of 532 patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, between March 2013 and December 2017. Results: Approximately one-third of patients underwent the procedure between 4 and 30 days after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. The conversion rate was 3.8%. The need for abdominal drainage and the finding of biliary tract injury after surgery were observed in 15.1% and 1.9% of patients, respectively. The length of stay was significantly shorter among patients undergoing surgery more than 30 days after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. These patients had a median length of stay of one day, whereas the median length of stay in the group undergoing the procedure between 4 and 30 days after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography was 2 days. Conclusion: The period during which we should avoid cholecystectomy is between 4 and 30 days after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

RESUMO Objetivo: Analisar o período durante o qual devemos evitar a colecistectomia após a colangiopancreatografia retrógrada endoscópica. Métodos: Foi realizada análise retrospectiva dos prontuários eletrônicos de 532 pacientes submetidos à colangiopancreatografia retrógrada endoscópica, no período de março de 2013 a dezembro de 2017. Resultados: Cerca de um terço dos pacientes realizaram o procedimento entre 4 e 30 dias após a colangiopancreatografia retrógrada endoscópica. A frequência de conversão do procedimento foi de 3,8%. A necessidade de dreno abdominal e o achado de lesão de via biliar após a cirurgia atingiram 15,1% e 1,9% dos pacientes, respectivamente. O tempo de internação foi significativamente menor entre os pacientes com tempo de colangiopancreatografia retrógrada endoscópica superior a 30 dias. Estes pacientes apresentaram, em mediana, um dia de internação hospitalar, enquanto o tempo mediano de internação no grupo que realizou o procedimento entre 4 e 30 dias foi de 2 dias. Conclusão: O período durante o qual devemos evitar realizar a colecistectomia após a colangiopancreatografia retrógrada endoscópica é do 4° ao 30° dia.

Canulación biliar difícil: precorte precoz tipo fistulotomía para evitar la pancreatitis post CPRE. Un análisis retrospectivo de dos años / Difficult biliary cannulation: early precut fistulotomy to avoid post ERCP pancreatitis. A retrospective analysis for two years

Antecedentes: La canulación biliar difícil es un factor de riesgo para la pancreatitis post-CPRE. En estos casos el precorte es la técnica más usada. Objetivo: Demostrar que el precorte tipo fistulotomía es seguro y eficaz. Materiales y métodos: Se revisaron los datos de mayo de 2016 a mayo de 2018. Se definió canulación difícil como: litiasis impactada, canulación inadvertida del conducto pancreático en tres ocasiones e incapacidad para lograr la canulación en 3 minutos. Las medidas de resultados fueron la canulación biliar exitosa y la pancreatitis post-CPRE. Resultados: Se realizó precorte tipo fistulotomía en 96 casos (67 mujeres, 29 hombres). La tasa de éxito de la canulación biliar fue del 95,8% (92/96). Ochenta pacientes tenían factores de riesgo para pancreatitis post CPRE: 29 tuvieron un solo factor de riesgo, 26 tuvieron dos, 19 tuvieron tres y 6 tuvieron cuatro. Factores de riesgo ampulares de canulación difícil: calculo impactado 9 casos, abultamiento de la papila en 10 casos, ubicación inferior del orificio papilar en 38 casos, localización parcial del poro papilar en 23 y estenosis del orificio papilar en 16 casos. Diez pacientes tuvieron divertículo periampular, 7 pacientes tuvieron conducto biliar normal. Ninguno de los pacientes experimentó pancreatitis. Tres pacientes tuvieron sangrado precoz, una paciente presento sangrado tardío. Un paciente (2%) tuvo fiebre y fue hospitalizado. Conclusiones: En casos de canulación biliar difícil el precorte tipo fistulotomía es seguro y eficaz.

Background: Difficult biliary cannulation is a risk factor for post-ERCP pancreatitis. In these cases, precutting is the most used technique. Objective: To demonstrate that precut fistulotomy is safe and effective. Materials and methods: Data from May 2016 to May 2018 were reviewed. Difficult cannulation was defined as: impacted lithiasis, inadvertent cannulation of the pancreatic duct on three occasions and inability to achieve deep biliary cannulation in 3 minutes. The outcome measures were successful biliary cannulation and post-ERCP Pancreatitis. Results: Precut fistulotomy was performed in 96 cases (67 women, 29 men). The success rate of biliary cannulation was 95.8% (92/96). Eighty patients had risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: 29 had 1 risk factor, 26 had 2 risk factors, 19 had 3 risk factors, and 6 had four risk factors. Ampullary risk factors of difficult cannulation: impacted stone in the papilla: 9 cases, papilla bulging: 10 cases, lower location of the hole papillary 38 cases, partial location of the papillary pore 23 and papillary orifice stenosis 16 cases. Ten patients had periampullary diverticulum, 7 patients had normal bile duct. None of the patients experienced Pancreatitis. Three patients had early bleeding, one patient had late bleeding. One patient (2%) had a fever and was hospitalized. Conclusions: In cases of difficult biliary cannulation, the precut fistulotomy is safe and effective.

Innovative hybrid technique for bile duct exploration in the treatment of choledocholithiasis

Introduction: Common bile stone disease (CBDS) is frequent and has potentially severe complications, such as acute biliary pancreatitis and cholangitis. Unnecessary and unplanned procedures should be avoided, so before choosing the best treatment of common bile duct lithiasis it is essential to have a proper diagnose. CBDS is currently treated by therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) or laparoscopic bile duct exploration (LCBDE). Results: The aim of this article is to present an innovative hybrid technique for common bile duct exploration, as an option for cases where the laparoscopic approach is not resolutive, avoiding the need for conversion to open approach technique. Conclusions: The hybrid technique has the same benefits as open and laparoscopic techniques, but without increasing material costs and with good resolution in complex cases of common bile duct stones. (AU)

Tratamiento conservador de perforación duodenal intraperitoneal secundaria a colangiopancreatografía retrógrada endoscópica en un paciente pediátrico / Conservative treatment of intra-peritoneal duodenal perforation after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in a pediatric patient

Introducción: las perforaciones duodenales son consideradas lesiones de extrema gravedad a cualquier edad. Su etiología puede ser por traumatismos, o después de la realización de un procedimiento endoscópico digestivo. Debido a la elevada morbilidad y mortalidad de estas lesiones, su tratamiento quirúrgico ha sido el método de elección durante años en la mayoría de los casos. Más recientemente se ha reportado con éxito el tratamiento no quirúrgico en pacientes seleccionados. Presentación del caso: se presenta el caso de tratamiento exitoso no quirúrgico en un adolescente de 13 años con una perforación duodenal intraperitoneal después de una colangiopancreatografía retrógrada endoscópica. Las medidas terapéuticas en este caso fueron: la suspensión de la vía oral, el uso de nutrición parenteral total, la administración de análogo de la somatostatina y los antibióticos sistémicos. Conclusiones: la perforación duodenal intraperitoneal después de una colangiopancreatografía retrógrada endoscópica en niños puede ser diagnosticada precozmente. El tratamiento médico basado en la observación estricta del enfermo, la nutrición parenteral total, la suspensión de la alimentación oral, la aspiración nasogástrica octeotride y la administración de antibióticos sistémicos, es eficaz en enfermos selectos(AU)

Introduction: duodenal perforations are considered extremely serious lesions at any age. Its etiology may be due to trauma, or after performing a digestive endoscopic procedure. Due to the high morbidity and mortality of these injuries, surgical treatment has been the method of choice for years in most cases. More recently, non-surgical treatment has been reported successfully in selected patients. Case presentation: it is presented a case of successful non-surgical treatment in a 13-year-old adolescent with intra-peritoneal duodenal perforation after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Therapeutic measures in this case were: the suspension of the oral route, the use of total parenteral nutrition, the administration of the somatostatin analog and systemic antibiotics. Conclusions: intra-peritoneal duodenal perforation after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in children can be diagnosed early. Medical treatment based on strict observation of the patient, total parenteral nutrition, suspension of oral feeding, nasogastric octeotride aspiration; and administration of systemic antibiotics is effective in selected patients(AU)

Ercp performance in a tertiary brazilian center: focus on new risk factors, complications and quality indicators / Performance de cpre em centro terciário brasileiro: foco em novos fatores de risco, complicações e indicadores de qualidade

ABSTRACT Background: ERCP can lead to complications, which can be prevented by the recognition of risk factors. Aim: To identify these risk factors, with quality evaluation. Methods: Retrospective study in a Brazilian hospital in 194 patients, excluding surgically altered anatomy. Results: 211 ERCPs were performed: 97.6% were therapeutic, 83.4% were started by trainees, with deep cannulation rate of 89.6%. Precut was needed in 16.6% of the ERCPs and classic sphincterotomy in 67.3%, with 75.4% of ductal clearance at single session and 8.0% of technical failure. Inacessible papillas ocurred in 2.5% of cases. There were 2.5% of late complications and 16% of early complications. Multivariate analysis identified six predictors for early complications: fistulotomy precut (OR=3.4, p=0.010), difficult cannulation (OR=21.5, p=0.002), attending's procedural time (OR=2.4, p=0.020), choledocholithiasis (adjusted OR=1.8, p=0.015), cannulation time (adjusted OR=3.2, p=0.018) and ERCP duration (adjusted OR=2.7, p=0.041). Conclusion: Six risk factors for post-ERCP complications were identified. ERCP duration and cannulation time are suggested as new potential quality indicators.

RESUMO Racional: A CPRE está associada a complicações, que podem ser prevenidas pelo reconhecimento de fatores de risco. Objetivo: Identificar tais fatores em nosso meio, com avaliação de qualidade. Métodos: Estudo retrospectivo em 194 pacientes de um hospital brasileiro, excluindo-se anatomia cirurgicamente alterada. Resultados: Executaram-se 211 CPREs: 97.6% foram terapêuticas, 83.4% iniciadas pelos residentes, com 89.6% de taxa de canulação profunda. Pré-corte foi necessário em 16.6% das CPREs e papilotomia clássica em 67.3%, com esvaziamento ductal de 74.5% em única sessão e 8.0% de falha técnica. Papilas inacessíveis ocorreram em 2.5% dos casos. Houve complicações tardias (2.5%) e precoces (16%). Em análise multivariada, identificaram-se seis preditores para complicações precoces: fistulotomia (RC=3.4, p=0.010), canulação difícil (RC=21.5, p=0.002), tempo do preceptor no procedimento (RC=2.4, p=0.020), coledocolitíase (RC ajustada=1.8, p=0.015), tempo de canulação (RC ajustada=3.2, p=0.018) e duração da CPRE (RC ajustada=2.7, p=0.041). Conclusão: Identificaram-se seis fatores para complicações pós-CPRE, sugerindo-se duração da CPRE e tempo de canulação como novos potenciais indicadores de qualidade.

Conociendo una complicación poco frecuente de la colangiopancreatografía retrógrada endoscópica / Knowing an infrequent complication of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

Objetivo: Describir las características clínicas y tomográficas en relación a la distribución extra peritoneal de colecciones y aire seguida de perforación periampular luego de la realización de colangiopancreatografía retrograda endoscópica (CPRE) con o sin esfinterotomía. Materiales y métodos: Estudio observacional, descriptivo y transversal, en pacientes con perforación periampular, después de CPRE con o sin enfinterotomía, tratados en el Servicio de Cirugía de Páncreas del Hospital Edgardo Rebagliati Martins, Lima, Perú, entre enero del 2013 y enero del 2015. Resultados: Se incluyeron 10 pacientes con perforación periampular, después CPRE. El 40% fue de sexo masculino. La edad media fue de 47,2 años. El 100% presento dolor abdominal, el 70% fiebre, el 60% presentó ictericia, intolerancia oral y vómitos. En el 100% de los casos la indicación del procedimiento fue por litiasis coledociana. Se describe canulación difícil en el 80% de los casos. Se encontró aire o líquido en el 90% en los espacios pararrenal anterior derecho y el perirrenal derecho, y el lugar en donde se distribuyó el aire o liquido con menor frecuencia fue la pelvis extra peritoneal derecha con el 20%, en ningún caso se evidenció aire en el mediastino. Conclusiones: El hallazgo de una colección líquida y/o aire en el espacio retroperitoneal derecho, después de CPRE, sin mayor afección de la glándula pancreática, debe hacernos pensar en perforación periampular, sobre todo si se encuentra en el espacio pararrenal anterior derecho y el espacio perirrenal derecho. A esta entidad nosotros la hemos denominado bilioretroperitoneo.

Objective: Describe the clinical and tomographic characteristics in relation to the extra peritoneal distribution of collections and air in patients with periampullary perforation after performing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with or without sphincterotomy. Materials and methods: Observational, descriptive study in patients with periampullary perforation after ERCP with or without sphincterotomy, treated in the Pancreas Surgery Service at Edgardo Rebagliati Martins Hospital, Lima, Peru between January 2013 and January 2015. Results: Ten patients with periampullary perforation after ERCP were included. 40% were male. The mean age was 47.2 years. 100% showed abdominal pain, fever 70%, 60% had jaundice, oral intolerance and vomiting. In 100% of cases the description of the procedure was for choledocolithiasis. Difficult cannulation is described in 80% of cases. Air or fluid was found in 90% in the right anterior pararenal space and the right perirenal, and the place where air or liquid is distributed less frequently was right extraperitoneal pelvis with 20%, in no case revealed air in the mediastinum. Conclusions: The finding of a liquid collection and / or air in the retroperitoneal space right after ERCP without further involvement of the pancreatic gland should make us think of periampullary perforation, especially if you are in the right anterior pararenal space and perirenal space. This entity we call bilioretroperitoneo.

Guide wire-assisted cannulation versus conventional contrast to prevent pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized control trials / Canulación asistida por alambre guía versus contraste convencional para prevenir la pancreatitis: Una revisión sistemática y meta-análisis basados en ensayos aleatorios controlados

Objective: Through this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aim to clarify the differences between these two techniques, thus improving primary success cannulation and reducing complications during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, primarily pancreatitis. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted to search for data available up until June2015from the most important databases available in the health field: EMBASE, MEDLINE (via PubMed), Cochrane, LILACS and CENTRAL (via BVS), SCOPUS, the CAPES database (Brazil), and gray literature. Results: Nine randomized clinical trialsincluding2583 people were selected from20,198 studies for meta-analysis. Choledocholithiasis had been diagnosed in mostly (63.8%) of the patients, who were aged an average of 63.15 years. In those patients treated using the guide wire-assisted cannulation technique, provided a significantly lower instance of pancreatitis (RD=0.03; 95% CI: 0.01-0.05; I2= 45%) and greater primary success cannulation (RD=0.07; 95% CI: 0.03-0.12; I2=12%) than conventional contrast cannulation. Conclusions: The guide wire-assisted technique, when compared to the conventional contrast technique, reduces the risk of pancreatitis and increases primary success cannulation rate. Thus, guide wire-assisted cannulation appears to be the most appropriate first-line cannulation technique

Objetivo: A través de esta revisión sistemática y meta-análisis, nuestro objetivo es aclarar las diferencias entre estas dos técnicas, mejorando así la canulación de éxito primario y reducir las complicaciones durante la colangiopancreatografía retrógrada endoscópica, principalmente la pancreatitis. Métodos: Una búsqueda exhaustiva se realizó para buscar datos disponibles hasta junio de 2015, desde las bases de datos más importantes disponibles en el campo de la salud: EMBASE, MEDLINE (vía PubMed), Cochrane, LILACS y CENTRAL (a través de la BVS), SCOPUS, la base de datos CAPES (Brasil), y la literatura gris. Resultados: Nueve ensayos clínicos aleatorios incluyendo 2583 personas fueron seleccionados de 20198 estudios de meta- análisis. Coledocolitiasis había sido diagnosticada en su mayoría (63,8%) de los pacientes, que tenían entre un promedio de 63,15 años. En los pacientes tratados con la técnica de canulación guiada, proporcionado una instancia significativamente menor de pancreatitis (RD=0,03; IC del 95%: 0,01-0,05; I2=45%) y una mayor canalización de éxito primario (RD=0,07; IC del 95%: 0,03-0.12; I2=12%) que la canulación por contraste. Conclusiones: La técnica canulación con alambre guía, en comparación a la técnica de contraste convencional, reduce el riesgo de pancreatitis y aumenta la tasa de canulación con éxito primario. Por lo tanto, canulación con alambre guía parece ser la técnica de canulación de primera línea y la más adecuada

Colangiopancreatografía retrógrada endoscópica en pacientes de la tercera edad / Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in elderly patients

Introducción: la colangiopancreatografía endoscópica retrógrada es un procedimiento que permite el tratamiento mínimamente invasivo de afecciones biliopancreáticas. Objetivos: describir los resultados de las colangiopancreatografía endoscópica retrógrada realizadas en pacientes de la tercera edad y comparar los síntomas y signos, motivos de indicación, diagnósticos, maniobras terapéuticas y complicaciones con los de los adultos no ancianos. Métodos: se realizó un estudio descriptivo, que incluyó a 120 pacientes a los que se les realizó colangiopancreatografía endoscópica retrógrada en el servicio de Gastroenterología del Hospital Militar Dr. Luis Díaz Soto desde septiembre 2012 hasta diciembre del 2013. Los pacientes fueron divididos en dos grupos de edades y se tomó como punto de corte los 65 años. Se analizaron variables clínicas, endoscópicas y las complicaciones. Resultados: no se encontraron diferencias entre los síntomas y signos. Predominaron en el grupo de ancianos la indicación de la CPRE ante la sospecha de tumores (30/120, 25 por ciento, p=0,001) y el diagnóstico de estenosis maligna de la vía biliar distal (23/120, 19,1 por ciento, p=0,02). La fosfatasa alcalina estuvo más elevada en estos casos (1066,3 mmol/L, p=0,05). La litiasis coledociana fue más común entre los más jóvenes (39/120, 32,5 por ciento, p=0,001), en ellos se realizó mayor número de esfinterotomías (50/120; 41,6 por ciento, p=0,05). Ocurrió un 5 por ciento de complicaciones leves, de tipo hemorrágicas en los ancianos. No existió mortalidad. Conclusiones: se confirma el valor de la colangiopancreatografía endoscópica retrógrada como procedimiento seguro en pacientes de la tercera edad, que permite el tratamiento curativo o paliativo de afecciones biliopancreáticas(AU)

Introduction: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a procedure that allows the minimally invasive treatment of biliopancreatic conditions. Objectives: To describe the results of the ERCP in aged patients and to compare the symptoms and signs, reasons of indication, diagnoses, therapeutic maneuvers and complications with those of non-aged adults. Methods: Descriptive study that included 120 patients who were performed endoscopic retrograde cholangeiopancreatography at the Gastroenterology servvice of Dr. Luis Díaz Soto Military Hospital from September 2012 to December 2013. The patients were divided into two age groups and the cutoff point was 65 years. Clinical and endoscopic variables as well as complications were analyzed. Results: No differences between symptoms and signs were found. In the elderly group, the indication of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in view of tumor suspicion (30/120, 25 percent, p=0.001) and the diagnosis of malignant distal biliary tract stenosis (23/120, 19.1 percent, p=0.02) prevailed. The alkaline fosfatase values were higher in these cases (1066.3 mmol/L, p=0.05). Cholelithiasis was more common in youngsters (39/120, 32,5 percent, p=0,001) who underwent sphyncterotomy more frequently (50/120, 41,6 percent, p=0,05). Five percent of slight complications, of hemorrhagic type occurred in the elderly. There were no deaths. Conclusions: This paper confirmed the value of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography as safe procedure in elderly patients that allows the curative or palliative treatment of biliopancreatic diseases(AU)

Tratamiento endoscópico en la pancreatitis crónica: seguimiento a largo plazo / Endoscopic treatment in chronic pancreatitis: long-term results in 18 patients

Background: Intraductal stones, ductal abnormalities and pancreatic pseudocysts are part of chronic pancreatitis (CP). The goal of treatment is pain relief, resolution of local complications and relapse prevention. Endoscopic therapy (ET) can be considered in those who do not respond to medical treatment. Aim: To evaluate the indication, immediate and long-term results of ET in CP patients. Patients and Methods: Review of a database of patients with CP analyzing results of ET in 18 patients aged 16 to 60 years (13 males). Demographics, etiology, endoscopic technique, indication for treatment, pain relief, relapses and complications were recorded. Results: The etiology of CP was alcohol consumption in 5, idiopathic in 11, hereditary in one and autoimmune in one case. The follow-up period was 6 months to 14 years. Seven patients had diabetes mellitus type 3c and eight had moderate to severe exocrine pancreatic insufficiency. Pancreatic papillotomy was performed in all patients, with removal of some stones, without attempting a complete clearance of the pancreatic duct. In addition, a 7-10 French stent was placed in the main pancreatic duct in 15 patients with varying permanence (months to years). The stent was changed guided by recurrence of clinical symptoms. During the follow-up period, 10 patients remained asymptomatic and in three, pain or relapse were significantly reduced. Stenting failed in one patient for technical reasons. Two patients were operated. There were neither immediate nor late complications from ET. Conclusions: Long-lasting improvement of CP was observed in 13 of 18 patients treated with ET, without complications associated with the procedure.

Morbilidad postoperatoria por colangiografía endoscópica retrógrada con o sin papilotomía ulterior: serie de casos / Postoperative morbidity by endoscopic retrograde cholangiography with or without ulterior papillotomy: series of cases

La patología biliar litiásica es frecuente en nuestro país, con prevalencias entre 30% y 50%; y la ictericia obstructiva secundaria a coledocolitiasis (IOC), constituye un motivo de consulta frecuente en los servicios de urgencia. Por otra parte, la papilotomía endoscópica (PE) post colangiografía retrógrada endoscópica (CRE), constituye el tratamiento de elección en estos casos; sin embargo, es un procedimiento no exento de complicaciones. El objetivo de este estudio, es describir la MPO e identificar posibles factores de riesgo (FR) asociados a MPO, en pacientes con IOC, sometidos a PE. Serie de casos retrospectiva, de pacientes con IOC, a quienes se les realizó CRE y ulterior PE. La variable resultado fue desarrollo de MPO (hemorragia, perforación y pancreatitis). Otras variables de interés fueron canulación, dificultad de ésta, desarrollo de PE, uso de pre corte y mortalidad. La recolección de datos se realizó mediante una pauta ad-hoc, en la que se registraron las variables extraídas desde el protocolo operatorio y la ficha clínica. Se aplicó estadística descriptiva y analítica (Chi2 de Pearson y exacto de Fisher) para estimar fuerza de asociación. Se intervinieron 200 pacientes. La Media de edad fue de 60±18 años; 62% eran mujeres (n= 124). Se registró MPO en 32 casos (16,0%): Perforación (0,5%), pancreatitis (2,0%) y hemorragia (13,5%). La serie no registró mortalidad. No se logró objetivar asociación entre la variable "canulación difícil" y las variables hemorragia (p= 0,214); pancreatitis (p= 0,519); ni perforación (p= 1). Sin embargo, se verificó asociación entre el desarrollo de hemorragia y la realización de PE (p= 0,017). La hemorragia es la MPO más frecuente en esta serie; y la PE es un FR para el desarrollo de hemorragia.

Bileduct stones is prevalent in our country, with prevalences between 30% and 50%; and obstructive jaundice secondary to choledocholithiasis (OJC), is a frequent reason of consultation in emergency services. Furthermore, endoscopic papillotomy (EP) post ERCP is the treatment of choice in these cases; however, it is not free of complications (POM). The aim of this study is to describe POM and identify potential risk factors (RF) associated with POM in patients with OJC, underwent PE. Retrospective case series of patients with OJC, who underwent ERCP and subsequent PE. Outcome variable was the development of POM (bleeding, perforation, and pancreatitis). Other variables of interest were cannulation, difficulty of this, developing PE, using precut and mortality. Data collection was performed by an ad-hoc pattern in which the variables extracted from surgical protocols and clinical data were recorded. Descriptive and analytical statistics (Pearson Chi2 and Fisher's exact test) were applied to assess strength of association. 200 patients were operated. The mean age was 60±18 years; 62% were women (n = 124). MPO was recorded in 32 cases (16.0%): perforation (0.5%), pancreatitis (2.0%) and bleeding (13.5%). The series does not record mortality. It was not possible to objectify association between "difficult cannulation" and the variables bleeding (p= 0.214); pancreatitis (p= 0.519); and perforation (p= 1). However, association between bleeding and performing PE (p= 0.017) was observed. Hemorrhage is the most common cause of MPO in this series; and PE is a RF for the development of bleeding.

Oral udenafil and aceclofenac for the prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis in high-risk patients: a randomized multicenter study

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Acute pancreatitis is a common complication of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Combination therapy w ith ora l udenafil and aceclofenac may reduce the occurrence of post-ERCP pancreatitis by targeting different pathophysiological mechanisms. We investigated whether combining udenafil and aceclofenac reduced the rates of post-ERCP pancreatitis. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study was conducted in four academic medical centers. Between January 2012 and June 2013, a total of 216 patients who underwent ERCP were analyzed for the occurrence of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Patients were determined to be at high risk for pancreatitis based on validated patient and procedure-related risk factors. RESULTS: Demographic features, indications for ERCP, and therapeutic procedures were similar in each group. There were no significant differences in the rate (15.8% [17/107] vs. 16.5% [18/109], p = 0.901) and severity of post-ERCP pancreatitis between the udenafil/aceclofenac and placebo groups. One patient in each group developed severe pancreatitis. Multivariate analyses indicated that suspected dysfunction of the sphincter of Oddi and endoscopic papillary balloon dilation without sphincterotomy were associated with post-ERCP pancreatitis. CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy with udenafil and aceclofenac is not effective for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis.

Efficacy and Safety of Pancreatobiliary Endoscopic Procedures during Pregnancy

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic therapy with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has been suggested as an effective diagnostic and therapeutic tool for biliary and pancreatic disorders during pregnancy. In this report, we describe our experiences with pancreatobiliary endoscopic procedures during pregnancy. METHODS: We reviewed ERCP and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) procedures that were performed at a single tertiary care referral center between January 2002 and October 2013. Medical records were reviewed for the procedure indication, the duration of fluoroscopy, postprocedure complications, etc. Pregnancy outcomes and fetal complications were identified by chart review and phone calls to patients. RESULTS: A total of 10 ER-CPs and five EUSs were performed in 13 pregnant patients: four of whom underwent the procedure in the first trimester, eight in the second trimester, and one in the third trimester. Indications for endoscopic therapy included gallstone pancreatitis, obstructive jaundice with common bile duct (CBD) stone, asymptomatic CBD stone, pancreatic cyst, choledochal cyst, and acute cholecystitis. Only one patient had a complication, which was postprocedural hyperamylasemia. Two patients underwent an artificial abortion, one according to her own decision and the other due to an adverse drug reaction. CONCLUSIONS: ERCP seems to be effective and safe for pregnant women. Additionally, EUS can be an alternative to ERCP during pregnancy.

Clinical Features and Outcomes of Endoscopic Treatment for Stones in Stemware-Shaped Common Bile Ducts: A Multicenter Data Analysis

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Various anatomical features of the biliary tree affect ability to remove difficult common bile duct (CBD) stones. In this study, we evaluated the clinical characteristics and outcomes of the endoscopic treatment of stones in stemware-shaped CBDs. METHODS: Thirty-four patients with a stone and a stemware-shaped CBD who were treated at different tertiary referral centers from January 2008 to December 2012 were studied retrospectively. When stone removal failed, percutaneous or direct peroral cholangioscopic lithotripsy, endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage, or surgery was performed as a second-line procedure. RESULTS: The overall success rate of the first-line procedure was 41.2%. Five of the 34 patients (14.7%) experienced procedure-related complications. No procedure-related mortality occurred. Mechanical lithotripsy was required to completely remove stones in 13 patients (38.2%). Conversion to a second-line procedure was required in 20 patients (58.8%). Mechanical lithotripsy was needed in 75% and 66.7% of those with a stone size of or =1 cm, respectively. Stone recurrence occurred in two patients (9.1%) after 6 months and 27 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The endoscopic treatment of stones in a stemware-shaped CBD is challenging. The careful assessment of difficult CBD stones is required before endoscopic procedures.

Different Strategies for Transpancreatic Septotomy and Needle Knife Infundibulotomy Due to the Presence of Unintended Pancreatic Cannulation in Difficult Biliary Cannulation

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Several precut techniques have been used to gain biliary access for difficult cases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the success and complication rates of two precut techniques, transpancreatic septotomy (TPS) and needle knife infundibulotomy (NKI), in difficult biliary cannulation due to the presence of unintended pancreatic cannulation. METHODS: Eighty-six patients who failed standard biliary cannulation were included. TPS was performed when we failed to achieve biliary access despite 5 minutes of attempted cannulation or when more than three attempted unintended pancreatic cannulations occurred. If deep cannulation was not achieved within 5 minutes for any duct, NKI was performed. If this failed, we crossed over to the other technique in the second attempt. RESULTS: The initial total success rate of biliary cannulation was 88.4% (86.6% for the TPS group and 94.7% for the NKI group, p=0.447). After crossover of the techniques, the final success rate was 95.3%. The complication rate was 20.9% in patients with TPS and 15.8% in patients with NKI (p=0.753). CONCLUSIONS: The use of different strategies based on the presence of unintended pancreatic cannulation may help increase the success rate for difficult biliary cannulation without increasing complication rates.

Intraductal Ultrasonography without Radiocontrast Cholangiogram in Patients with Extrahepatic Biliary Disease

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Intraductal ultrasonography (IDUS) has been performed as an adjunct to endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) during radiocontrast cholangiography (RC). Radiation exposure during RC poses a health risk to both patients and examiners. We evaluated the feasibility of IDUS without RC in various extrahepatic biliary diseases. METHODS: IDUS was performed with the insertion of an IDUS probe from the papilla of Vater to the confluent portion of the common hepatic duct without fluoroscopy. The technical success rate and procedure-related complications were evaluated retrospectively. RESULTS: Wire-guided IDUS without RC was performed in 105 patients. The mean age was 66.5 years, and 50 (47.6%) were male. The IDUS diagnoses included choledocholithiasis (73, 69.5%), benign biliary stricture (11, 10.5%), choledocholithiasis with biliary pancreatitis (9, 8.6%), bile duct cancer (5, 4.8%), pancreatic cancer (1, 0.9%), and others (6, 5.7%). After IDUS, 66 (62.8%) underwent stone removal, 19 (18.1%) underwent biliary drainage, and 7 (6.6%) underwent brush cytology and biopsy. No significant complications such as perforation or severe pancreatitis occurred. CONCLUSIONS: IDUS without RC was a feasible and safe approach in patients with various extrahepatic biliary diseases. We anticipate a potentially important role of IDUS in various ERC procedures because it lacks the hazards of RC.

Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography during Pregnancy: Really Guarantee to Safety?

No abstract available.

Acute pulmonary embolism during an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

A 76‑year‑old female patient presented for an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for the removal of a biliary stent and lithotripsy. During the procedure, an acute drop in the end‑tidal CO2, followed by cardiovascular collapse prompted the initiation of the advanced cardiac life support protocol. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) demonstrated direct evidence of pulmonary embolism. The patient was promptly treated with thrombolytic therapy and subsequently discharged home on oral warfarin therapy, with no noted sequelae. Although, there have been case reports of air embolism during an ERCP presenting with cardiovascular collapse, to the best of our knowledge, there are no reported cases of acute pulmonary embolus during this procedure. While the availability of TEE in the operating suites is quite common, quick access and interpretation capabilities in remote locations may not be as common. With the expansion of anesthesia services outside of the operating rooms, it may be prudent to develop rapid response systems that incorporate resources such as TEE and trained personnel to deal with such emergent situations.